This article is reposted and translated from the original post from KOPP report, a German paper. Canadians would do well to pay attention to this. There is already a significant housing shortage problem in our larger centers, and the projected increase in immigration by the Liberal government will compound this problem exponentially.
According to the Federal Working Community (BAG) homelessness assistance, the number of people without their own home has increased significantly: In 2017 there were still 650,000 homeless in Germany, compared to 678,000 last year, an increase of 4.2 percent.
Around 41,000 people had no accommodation at all and therefore had to live permanently on the streets. With just under 6 percent, the increase in refugees was particularly strong, being considered as homeless also, who lives in a community accommodation.
The BAG cites three main reasons for the rampant housing shortage, which particularly affects socially weak people:
The insufficient supply of affordable housing, the decline in the stock of social housing and the growing poverty in German society.
Exactly these reasons are repeatedly called by the left political side, in order to denounce alleged failings of the state in the housing construction, above all, in order to divert from the true causes for the misery.
Because they do not quite fit into the left world view:
1) The negative interest rate policy of the ECB, which means that bonds no longer yield returns. Investors are therefore forced to shift their money into other assets such as stocks, precious metals and even real estate. This pushes up the prices on the housing market, which finally affects the rents that even middle-class families can hardly pay at least in the cities and increasingly in rural areas. The expansive monetary policy of the European Central Bank serves primarily to save the beleaguered euro and to keep the economically weak southern countries in the monetary union. The victims of this questionable strategy, which is without precedent in history, are savers, insurance customers and tenants in Germany!
2) Ever new and more comprehensive regulations that make building in Germany more expensive and make it unattractive for private investors to build affordable housing. Since reunification in 1990, the number of new real estate building regulations has quadrupled from 5,000 to 20,000. A not insignificant part of this development is attributable to the increased requirements for the energy performance of buildings, which are laid down in the Energy Saving Ordinance. This regulation is part of the climate policy of the Federal Government, which pursues the goal of raising Germany in the fight against global warming to a shining example, which should be followed by all other states. Teutonic megalomania, for which the tenants also have to bleed,
3) The most important reason: The continuing mass immigration to Germany, which has led to a significant increase in demand in the German housing market in recent years. Between 2014 and 2018, more than 3 million people came to Germany, net of emigration. Last year alone, the migration balance was just under 400,000 people, only marginally less than in 2017. If every year the population of a medium-sized city immigrated to the Federal Republic, then nobody should be surprised that the housing is scarce and rents rise, especially in the lower price segment.
After all, most of the immigrants are not high-skilled workers with a corresponding income, but low-income earners and social problem cases who are looking for cheap apartments. Despite the greatest efforts, housing construction can not keep up with the high migration dynamics. From planning to the turnkey handover of a residential building, years in overbureaucratised Germany pass by.
The accusation that the state has done too little in the past for social housing, fails. Because of the demographic decline over decades, long-term forecasts suggest a decline in housing demand and an increasingly relaxed housing market. Why are there still billions of taxpayers stuck in the expensive construction of social housing? No planner could expect that in 2015 our Chancellor would come up with the crazy idea of opening the borders of Germany to (alleged) refugees and thus triggering a wave of immigration unprecedented in this magnitude!
The real causes of the housing shortage in Germany are largely ignored by the political and media mainstream.
Instead, smoke-throats are thrown, culminating in the claim that the market has failed and the citizens now have to be protected by a statutory rental price brake against the drives of the evil speculators.
In truth, the market has not failed, because an increasing demand – even with an inflexible, because in the short term only limited expandable offer – leads now to rising prices. Every economics student learns in the first semester.
But politicians refuse this trivial knowledge and seek their salvation in planned economic measures. But these will deter private investors and even aggravate the housing problem in the medium to long term. That leaves even more homeless people in Germany to fear for the future!
Translated from the Original Article Posted on November 04, 2019 at 5:00 am by LaPresse.ca, GABRIELLE DUCHAINE
Will Canada bring back to the country its nationals suspected of having swelled the ranks of the ISIS armed group in Syria? Several sources say that a secret repatriation plan nearly ended last year, which Ottawa denies. One thing is certain, we asked everyone here to prepare for their return.
Canada has reportedly negotiated in the spring of 2018 the repatriation of 11 suspected Canadian jihadists and their 10 children, according to a British MP returned from a mission in Syria. In an affidavit obtained by La Presse , the authenticity of which was confirmed, he writes that Kurdish forces believed Canadians “a week away from home” before discussions broke down without further explanation.
According to Labor MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle, Canada and representatives of the Syrian Democratic Democratic Federation had documented in official documents how the evacuation of Canadian citizens would be organized. “I learned from Kurdish officials that there had been intensive discussions with Canadians. Together, they had taken various steps to repatriate all Canadians, which I understand included 21, including 10 children, “the affidavit says.
False, says Ottawa
In Ottawa, Global Affairs Canada categorically denies this information. “Reports of an agreement to repatriate Canadian citizens from Syria are false,” said spokeswoman Barbara Harvey.
The official position is: “Given the security situation on the ground, the Government of Canada’s ability to provide consular assistance throughout Syria is extremely limited. The government deals with these cases and provides assistance wherever possible. “
How to explain such a gap between the versions? According to a government source, the story of the failed repatriation is in fact a “test balloon” launched by the Kurds.
They have an interest in making these assertions to put pressure on foreign governments.
A government source
“They started doing this about a year ago, and there it seems they have stopped. The federal government has no interest in considering such an option. I can not imagine that he will do it in the future. “
A failed return?
La Presse spoke with several other people who are convinced that Canadians held in Syria nearly returned home last year.
This is the case of British human rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith, who works on the issue of the return of jihadists to their countries of origin. “At the time, the identity of 21 Canadians was known. A memorandum of understanding was reached in the city of Sulaymaniyah [Iraq] between the Syrians of the north-east and Canada to repatriate all Canadians, “the lawyer wrote in an email to La Presse .
He explained that these 21 people, women, men and several children, then filled out all the documents necessary for issuing emergency travel documents. “The documents to fill out were provided to them and they filled them out. And they took the pictures, “says M e Stafford Smith, who says he himself spoke to Roj camp Kurdish soldiers who helped the Canadian women. “The Canadian government then really filibustered and denied having received such requests, which forced us to go through the whole process again. This is what many women have done. “
FAVE Canada Director Alexandra Bain, who helps families of young parties to Syria, tells a similar story. In the spring of 2018, she said, Global Affairs Canada reportedly asked members of four families to help gather the information needed to issue travel documents, “so that all Canadians in the camp can be brought back to Canada together. “.
[In the camps], the women thought they would fly from one moment to the next. They believed so much that they were going away that they got rid of all their possessions.
Alexandra Bain, Director of FAVE Canada
In Canada, a confidential source directly involved in the investigation of young parties swelling the ranks of the Islamic State armed group also tells La Presse that “something happened” in the spring of 2018. “They had to bring people back by plane, but it did not happen, “says the source, who is not allowed to speak publicly. Since then, things have stalled.
Jack Letts, a British-Canadian who was taken out of the United Kingdom because she believes he is a jihadist, was part of the group, according to his family. “They told us in a letter that they were doing everything they could to get him out. We know that they met Kurdish officials and that things were progressing. And then, boom. They cut off all communications with us, “says his father John.
Ready for a return
Will come back? Will not come back? The question of the return of the emulators of the IS is a thorn in the foot for the government. According to an Ipsos poll on behalf of Global News, 71% of Canadians are opposed to the government “doing the right thing” to bring them back home.
This is a “very political” issue, in which the result of the last federal campaign could have an impact, says a confidential source who works with the police in the case of these young people and who fears to be sanctioned by speaking.
“There is disagreement among the different political parties, but I think there is a government position on the repatriation of Canadian nationals. “
I have the impression that [now that the election campaign has passed], such a position should prevail. So, yes, it is expected that there will be repatriation.
A confidential source
One thing is certain: Ottawa has asked field workers to prepare for the arrival of Canadian nationals from Syria.
In Montreal, a committee bringing together the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the director of youth protection and experts from the health network was set up. Who will be waiting at the airport? What will children do? “Everything has been planned, explains the child psychiatrist Cécile Rousseau, committee member. We are not in improvisation. “
Her team, she says, is ready to go to the airport “anytime”.
“They are coming from a war zone”
According to FAVE Canada figures, there are no more than 21, but 40 Canadians in camps or prisons controlled by Kurdish forces: about ten women, five men and about 25 children, 19 of whom are under the age of five.
If they manage to return, either on their own or with the help of the state, they will be expected by police officers, health professionals, DYP staff and interpreters. “They come from a war zone and camps where the physical and hygiene conditions are very poor. We know that we will have to mobilize actors in physical health, infectious diseases, nutrition and development. People are expected to be in poor physical condition, “says Dr. Rousseau. She adds that most children are born there and sometimes do not speak English or French.
Here is how we intend to proceed.
“A risk assessment is done for each subject returning from a conflict zone,” says Sergeant Hakim Bellal of the RCMP. Each file is investigated and each file differs from another, depending on the risk it poses to national security. We will make sure that the person returning to Canada will not pose a risk to the community. “
And how do we do it?
First, let us recall that since 2013, Canadian law considers that leaving or attempting to leave Canada to participate in the activities of a terrorist group is a criminal offense. The laying of criminal charges is therefore possible against some.
According to a confidential source involved in the investigation, the police are also interested in young Canadians who allegedly mistreated their servants in their “caliphate” house established by the IS, particularly in Syrian territories, subjecting them to ill-treatment and abuse. physical and sexual abuse. They could be charged under the Canadian Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.
At a minimum, the authorities would consider signing the return of Commitments to keep the peace, says the same source.
“Zero risk does not exist, but everything has been put in place so that there is no surprise,” says Sergeant Bellal. These files are closely followed by the RCMP. “
Contrary to the policy of some European countries, like France, children will not be systematically separated from their parents, explains the child psychiatrist Cécile Rousseau.
Welcoming returnees, she says, was designed according to a priority, that of the best interests of the child.
“In the event that a parent is arrested, he should be separated from his children. Even in a situation like this, it is important for the parent to be reassured about the child’s fate and to explain to him that they will be safe. This is very important to reassure children who are coming from a state of war, where security was far from secure. “
In the scenario where the parent is not charged, “there will be an assessment to see how the children and parents are going and, ultimately, determine what is best for the child’s best interests. Since there is a bond of attachment, it is better not to separate them. If you have parents who have very poor physical or mental health or abuse, the same rules that apply to Canadian parents would apply under the Youth Protection Act. “
In short, the alleged jihadists will be treated like any other parent.
This approach will not be unanimous, as Dr. Rousseau is aware of.
“Safer, more punitive approaches create a lot of harm, resentment and distress for parents and children. If children are treated with kindness and parents feel that their relationship is respected, we set the table for a relationship of respect essential to reintegration. It’s not about thinking the same thing as them. But that does not mean that the person is only that. You are not just someone who has done something wrong. You are also someone with children and we share a concern to protect them. “
– With the collaboration of Mélanie Marquis, La Presse
“A Canadian should be tried and imprisoned in Canada”
Put him in jail, but bring him back to Canada.
This is essentially the message of the father of the alleged British-Canadian jihadist Jack Letts, who is being held in a Syrian prison.
Since the United Kingdom withdrew citizenship from his son last summer, the Franco-Ontarian based in England has been focusing on Canada.
Even though he believes his boy’s innocence, John Letts does not ask Ottawa to give him a blank check.
“Once they are in Canada,” he says of the returning students, “they should all be jailed immediately. Nobody has ever said that they should be free. “
I would not want one of them to be free, including my son. But I think he should have access to a lawyer and he should have a trial.
“A friend’s daughter died in an explosion on the London Underground. I know people who have suffered from terrorism. I hate IS. I hate all that is violent, and if my son had been involved in something like that, I would condemn him in the public square. But I believe a Canadian remains a Canadian and should be tried and imprisoned in Canada if he has done something wrong, he says. I will condemn him if he has done something wrong, but I want to see evidence. Not just what newspapers keep repeating. “
The British media nicknamed him “Jack the jihadist”. His story is nebulous. Converted to Islam as a teenager, the young man took the road to Syria in 2014. He got married and had a child. Several media reported that he joined the jihadist group. Kurdish forces hold him on this premise. His father believes he was stuck in the IS territory.
“The cornerstone of democracy is that people are considered innocent until proven guilty. Our lawyers found no evidence that Jack had been involved in IS, that he was a fighter. From the moment we say that his name is Jack the jihadist, it says he is guilty. His name is Jack Letts. “
“We are working on your case”
Jack’s mother, Sally Lane, sent La Presse the transcript of a conversation he had with a Canadian official in January 2018, before he lost his British citizenship.
The woman asks him what are his conditions of detention, if he is fed regularly, if he can exercise. Then she offers him help.
Here are some excerpts:
Official: “I am from the Government of Canada. Do you want help from us? “
Letts: “Yes. Get me out of here. “
Official: “If it were possible, would you like to come to Canada? In Great Britain ? “
Letts: “I want to come back to Canada. “
The young man asks several times if she will be able to organize his repatriation.
Official: “We are working on your case. Talking with you is a positive first step. […] We will continue to try to find a solution. “
Letts: “Do you intend to take me back to Canada? “
Official: “We intend to try to help you. […] Canada is an option. […] We do not have anyone in Syria and it is a complex environment, so I can not give you a definitive timetable, but we are working on your case. “
“Children should be saved immediately”
What are Canada’s responsibilities to its citizens? Should children be treated differently from adults? Are returners a risk to national security? La Presse spoke with Phil Gurski, a former analyst for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.
Q. Does Canada have a legal or moral obligation to bring back suspected jihadists and their children?
A. These are two separate questions. According to [outgoing Minister of Public Safety] Ralf Goodale, Canada has no legal obligation to assist Canadians who have committed crimes outside Canada. Whether you are a jihadist in Iraq or a drug addict in Singapore, Canada has no obligation to send the police or army to save you. That’s the legal question.
There are some who argue that if there is no legal obligation, there is a moral obligation. And frankly, I wonder what that means. In the past, I said that since these people have become radicalized in Canada, they are our problem. These are not innocents who, once in Iraq, have become radicalized. The process of radicalization has occurred here in Canada. The problem is that the crimes were committed in Iraq or Syria. Do not the governments of these countries have the right to try them to punish them for crimes committed in their countries?
Q. Should we make a distinction between children and adults?
A. The children should be saved immediately. These children should be taken away from their parents, because in my opinion, a father or mother who travels to be part of the Islamic State group proves to me that he is not a parent. The Canadian government should save young children, take them away from their parents if they are alive, repatriate them to Canada and entrust them to other family members or entrust them to the state.
Q. Why would we decide to bring them back to the country?
A. Because a Canadian is a Canadian. Here is the famous quote from Trudeau four years ago [while he was Leader of the Opposition, Justin Trudeau made this statement to mean he opposed the withdrawal of their citizenship from terrorists]. The problem is that the vast majority of Canadians do not want to have anything to do with these people. So if the government decides to repatriate them all, men, women and children, it will not be popular with the vast majority of people. The reason the Liberals have not done anything so far is that they have nothing to gain.
Q. Do they pose a risk to national security?
A. Absolutely. Some of them ask one. There are some who will plan attacks or commit attacks. The other problem is that there are others who will return home without renouncing extremist or terrorist ideology. And they may radicalize other Canadians. Do we want someone who has spent time there to come back and recruit or radicalize people to follow the same path as them? Not everyone will return and commit an attack in the following week or month, but we can not predict it. You have to investigate everyone and determine the risk, and it takes time.
Q. Can we accuse them once here?
A. According to the Terrorism Act, it is a crime to leave Canada to join a terrorist group, but the problem is how to prove it? The evidence is in Syria. The evidence is in Iraq. The witnesses are there. The victims are there. It would be very difficult for a government to build a case that will be successfully tried in Canada. It is difficult to collect evidence in a war zone.
This was a fight that took place in London, Ontario October 29, 2019, the same time as we were doing our small rally in front of city hall, a few blocks away.
The following is a quote from a student observer:
“The Arabs were talking shit to to the Canadian (non Arab?) kids and it built up and today was the day it changed from words to punches. Arabs talking shit everyday and threatening to attack them (non Arabs). Arabs already had a beef with one of the Canadian boys and continued to talk shit about him and threatening to beat his ass and kill him and his friends. They went to go see the Canadian kids at lunch and the fight broke out. The fighting finally calmed when the kid that was kicked in the head started having a seizure”
How do we deal with this as Canadians? How do we get past this? With our new government, we can expect over 300,000 new immigrants every year. What happened in London is happening in cities throughout Canada. How will Canada deal with this?
Great little flash demo in London today. Not only did we address city hall once again, we spoke about the recent election and the dirty politics we have seen over the past several months, we also spoke about the Islamist agenda in conjunction with the demise of our Judeo/Christian ethic.
What was a highlight, however, was a chance to interact with a group of young high-school students after the rally. This was not recorded. Young people are our future, and speaking with them about our concerns was valuable indeed. The environment during this interaction was for the most part less than friendly, and one dominate individual was intent on showing his dominance in things pertaining to Islam. One issue in particular we talked about was the Quranic verse on wife beating, chapter 4:34 in the Quran. I questioned the dominate young man on that verse, he initially told me there was no such verse. I have a copy of the Quran with me, and I wanted to show the group this particular verse. I didn’t know where it was off the top of my head, so I googled it. As I did so, the group derided me, thinking I was stalling for time. I found the verse, recited it, and the dominate teen said to the rest of the group ‘I’ve got this’. He proceeded to explain the verse to me, that it was taken out of context, that it was an improper translation etc. I let him explain, but when it came time for me to rebut, they no longer had time to listen. The young man was lauded by his peers for ‘putting me in my place’ as it were, but I have to say, I saw some listening, interested young people. That is what we are after. We hope that some of the kids listened to what we had to say and will investigate further. I encouraged the kids to contact our facebook page for more information. As of 5:30 pm, no one has asked for additional information.
One person at a time, one rally at a time. It was a good day.
Surah 33:36 It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.
Surah 5:48 And We have sent down to you (O Muhammad) the Book (this Qur’an) in truth, confirming the Scripture that came before it and Mohayminan (trustworthy in highness and a witness) over it (old Scriptures) . So judge between them by what Allah has revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging away from the truth that has come to you. To each among you, We have prescribed a law and a clear way. If Allah willed, He would have made you one nation, but that (He) may test you in what He has given you; so strive as in a race in good deeds. The return of you (all) is to Allah; then He will inform you about that in which you used to differ.
These verses stress that sharia is mandatory, not a choice for Muslims. When an Islamic state has been established, it is imperative that they fight against those who oppose sharia.
Surah 9:29 . Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyahwith willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Canadian Imams and groups have voiced their desire for the implementation of sharia, including the group Hizb ut-Tahrir. Other Muslims in Canada have disputed this, one going as far as to say that these Imams that promote sharia should ‘go f*ck themselves’.
Is there a dissonance happening within the Islamic community in Canada? Is there a change, a reform happening with regards to Quranic interpretations?
Surah 15:9 Behold, it is We Ourselves who have bestowed from on high, step by step, this reminder? and, behold, it is We who shall truly guard it [from all corruption].
Saturday was special for us because we recognized and acknowledged the 26 Canadians who lost their lives in the terror attack on the twin towers September 11, 2001. Last year when we attempted to lay a wreath, the opposition made it almost impossible, and they promptly destroyed the wreath after we had finished. I have to ask, what kind of person would destroy something that was placed in memory of someone who had been killed? It boggles the mind. Most of our opposition are either Communists or Islamists, so that could be part of the explanation.
The placement this past Saturday went much better. The public was respectful, quiet and appreciative. We did not advertise this event, so the opposition had no idea we were doing this. We hope the wreath stays in place until the actual anniversary.
Last year, at this same time, we wanted to place a wreath in memory of the victims of the largest ever terror attack on Western soil. We did this after holding a rally on the corner of University and Armoury. Getting to this memorial was incredibly difficult, as the communist/Islamist counter protesters would not allow us to walk down the street. We were eventually able to place the wreath, but immediately after the placement, the counter protesters completely destroyed the wreath, and bragged about it online.
This year, we decided to hold this small memorial with no previous advertising, 11 days before the actual anniversary of 9/11. We hope the wreath will remain intact for longer.
Sept 11. 2001 will remain in our memories as a dark day in history. Nineteen men hijacked four fuel-loaded US commercial airplanes bound for west coast destinations. A total of 2,977 people were killed in New York City, Washington, DC and outside of Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
The attack was orchestrated by Islamist al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.
Twenty six of those who perished that day were Canadians. Though we remember all of the victims, today we focus on the Canadians. The wreath will be placed by Veteran Military Policeman Lawrence Nabozniak who served with the UN as a peacekeeper with UNDOF in the Golan Heights. After he places the wreath, we will have a moment of silence.
The Canadian victims of 9/11 were Michael Arczynski, Garnet (Ace) Bailey, David Barkway, Ken Basnicki, Jane Beatty, Joseph Collison, Cynthia Connolly, Arron Dack, Frank Joseph Doyle, Christine Egan, Michael Egan, Albert Elmarry, Meredith Ewart, Peter Feidelberg, Alexander Filipov, Ralph Gerhardt, Stuart Lee, Mark Ludvigsen, Bernard Mascarenhas, Colin McArthur, Michael Pelletier, Donald Robson, Ruffino (Roy) Santos, Vladimir Tomasevic, Chantal (Chanti) Vincelli and Debbie Williams.
A moment of silence.
Never Again. God keep our land glorious and free.
If you are interested in hearing what Pegida Canada is all about, we are holding a rally at 2pm on the corner of University and Armoury.
After this event, we went directly to our public rally on the corner of University and Armoury. This rally was sparsely attended. We had 10-15 supporters, but there were some new participants, everyday citizens, so we were very pleased. The rally followed the same format as per usual, with the usual counter protesters and police attendance. Once again, we were able to get very close to the passing public and speak directly to them. Many of them sat on the benches close by to listen. This is exactly what we are after. We were also able to speak with several passers-by. Another huge plus. Not all conversations were positive, but they were conversations. Again, this is what we are after.
What was amusing was the opposition had chalked slogans where we were rallying. Some we agreed with, others not so much.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
The counter protesters and some patriots consider our rally on Saturday a failure because of small numbers. It makes me think they have no idea what we are about. We are about information. And that is exactly what we did on Saturday. A great day. We got information out, everyone was safe.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Today, I will begin by speaking first about the upcoming election, one of the most important elections in Canadian history. The Liberal government has been under fire for Trudeau’s many indiscretions and downright unethical behaviour, but he is not the only one. It seems the fighting in the political camps is extremely intense and is sure to escalate as we draw closer to the election. One of the main themes of these accusations is accusations of either racism or pandering. Are these accusations accurate? Sometimes yes, sometimes no, but this seems to be the climate of today’s politics. This has been encouraged and exacerbated by the Motion put out by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid.
For the October election, there is an unprecedented number of Muslim candidates. More than just a few of these could be considered to be of the Islamist mindset. Ms Khalid is a prime example. Motion 103 quashes any criticism of Islam, let alone discussion. Ms Khalid was president of the Muslim Students Association when she was in university. The Muslim Students Association is a known arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist organization whose motto speaks volumes.
As a result of the many Muslim candidates, Muslim voter turnout will be higher than ever
Last April, Imams at 69 mosques in five provinces — Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Nova Scotia and Quebec — delivered a coordinated sermon in four different languages, emphasizing the importance of voting.
“As believers, every single one of us has social responsibilities that our very faith is contingent upon,” Imam Faraz Rabbani
Later in my speech, I will talk about what that faith encompasses and how it is delivered to congregations in mosques.
Most political parties are busy trying to appease their voters, be they minorities, special interest groups, companies, business and the like. Anyone that goes outside of these strictures is considered hateful. The case of the billboard for the new party the People’s Party of Canada comes to mind. This party’s stance on immigration seems to be politically incorrect in many people’s minds. The billboard stated ‘Say no to mass immigration’.
Let’s dissect this a bit. Mass immigration is irresponsible immigration. Letting thousand upon thousands of people into our country, it’s a monumental task to vet and place these people properly and would cost an untold amount. Yet, because this billboard offended the sensibilities of some bleeding hearts, the advertising company caved to the pressure and had them taken down.
The official opposition party was put under pressure by the National Council of Canadian Muslims to drop a candidate (Coptic Christian, saw attrocities) because this candidate spoke against Islamism. They considered this Islamophobic. By the way, the National Council of Canadian Muslims used to be called CAIR Canada, an extension of CAIR USA, another arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. Remember what the Muslim Brotherhood’s motto is?
Another MP was under fire for supposed Islamophobic comments as well.
And still another MP was forced to resign after criticizing a mosque leader.
This is what our election is turning around, political correctness, even though our current prime minister is anything but correct. I, for one, have great admiration for those who do not bow to this pressure. This is what Canada needs. Leadership that is not afraid to offend, a leadership that looks out for the good of ALL of Canada.
Be very careful who you vote for.
Islamism is something we are very concerned about, as a matter of fact, it is one of our main focuses. Islamism is a set of ideologies rooted in the concept of Islam as a political system as well as a religion; in short, that government should be based around Islamic teachings. This is why we are so concerned with Islamists in our government, law and education. The deceptiveness of the Islamist mindset is apparent if you know how to look for it. As I mentioned before, M103 is a big example. Crying Islamophobia, while promoting Islamic supremacy and dominance. Another good example of Islamism is western Islamists reaction to the situation we are seeing in Kashmir today. North American Islamists pushed alarmist rhetoric and double standards following the Indian ruling Party’s recent action ending autonomy for the Indian portion of Jammu and Kashmir. This is the same alarmist rhetoric we saw with M103.
Islamic Circle of North America, based in Queens, New York, strongly advocates for Kashmiri self-determination, yet there is silence on the forced expulsion by terrorists of hundreds of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits from the Kashmir Valley in the early 1990s. Additionally, the Islamists conveniently overlook the Pakistani state’s tyrannical subjugation. Western Islamists have remained silent about some of the deadliest attacks perpetrated by Pakistan-based jihadi groups in Jammu and Kashmir by the Pakistan-based designated terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed that killed 40 Indian soldiers. This is what Islamists do. They cry foul when Islam is supposedly under siege, yet continue to encourage Islamic promotion, whether this is through law, education or politics, superseding western ideals and using western law to promote Islam.
With Islamism, the whole of life concept of Islam is the goal and this of course includes sharia. And what is sharia? Sharia is Islamic law as dictated by the Quran and hadith. Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death. That is sharia. Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death. That is sharia. A man can unilaterally divorce his wife, but a woman needs her husbands consent to divorce. That is sharia. A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist. That is sharia. A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative. That is sharia. Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah. That is sharia. Criticizing of denying Allah, the god of Islam, is punishable by death. That is sharia. Theft is punishable by amputation. That is sharia. Gays must be put to death. That is sharia. By the way, there are domestic sharia courts in operation in Canada.
We have previously spoken about something called the Qatar papers, something that has been studied and revealed by Canadian anti terror expert, Tom Quiggin. A recently published book in France called Qatar Papers exposes radicalism and support for the Islamist Muslim brotherhood agenda throughout Europe and North America financed by Qatar. An intelligence leak occurred in Qatar and documents have emerged which shows how the state of Qatar via Qatar charity has been funding the Muslim Brotherhood throughout Europe Canada and the United States. Please remember what the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood is. (sign)
Nine Canadian politicians are said to be named as having signed letters of support for projects to further the Muslim Brotherhood in Canada, one of these politicians a sitting member of the Cabinet and others that include city council members from both Toronto and London.
Qatar is now the leading player in spreading Islamist extremism into Europe and North America via the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood ideology is amongst the worse of the worse. They are a supremacist organization, and anyone who opposes it must be crushed. Again, we see this influence in the presentation of M103. Qatar is putting money into schools and cultural centers to influence youth and convince them to remain isolated from Western influence. They also have their finger in news source Al Jazera, which has increasing influence in Canada through organizations such as the CBC and the Toronto Star.
As noted at previous rallies, the Toronto Star and CBC frequently promote Islam and Islamist activities. Their defense of blatant antisemitism and anti western speech coming out of mosques is astounding.
The Islamist influence can also be seen in the promotion the the BDS campaign, a campaign touted as concern for Palestinian oppression, but is really a cover for antisemitism. BDS stands for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions. This is a Pro Palestine/anti Israel initiative that is intent on the destruction of Israel. Here are a few quotes from prominent BDS activists that show this antisemitism very clearly. (signs)
One of the largest Islamist atrocities ever recorded on Western soil was of course 9/11. Sept 11. 2001 will remain in our memories as a dark day in history. Nineteen men hijacked four fuel-loaded US commercial airplanes bound for west coast destinations. A total of 2,977 people were killed in New York City, Washington, DC and outside of Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
The attack was orchestrated by Islamist al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. This was perpetrated in the name of Allah for the furtherance of Islam. This is Islamism.
Twenty six of those who perished that day were Canadians.. Michael Arczynski, Garnet (Ace) Bailey, David Barkway, Ken Basnicki, Jane Beatty, Joseph Collison, Cynthia Connolly, Arron Dack, Frank Joseph Doyle, Christine Egan, Michael Egan, Albert Elmarry, Meredith Ewart, Peter Feidelberg, Alexander Filipov, Ralph Gerhardt, Stuart Lee, Mark Ludvigsen, Bernard Mascarenhas, Colin McArthur, Michael Pelletier, Donald Robson, Ruffino (Roy) Santos, Vladimir Tomasevic, Chantal (Chanti) Vincelli and Debbie Williams lost their lives that day.
This was by far the largest attack on Western soil, but the attacks continue, nevertheless.
Jihad is a Quran sanctioned tool that Islamists use to further their ends. Jihad, according to Merriam Webster Dictionary means a holy war waged on behalf of Islam as a religious duty. A secondary definition is personal struggle in devotion to Islam. Jihad can and does encompass physical action such as terror, but jihad can be and is also be used in law, politics, education and social life. The promotion of Islam is what is key, and we see this jihad being implemented in all forms throughout the western world. Physical jihad or terror is easy to identify, though in our politically correct climate, it is often covered over or explained away. Non physical jihad it harder to detect and fight. Again, I bring up M103. This is a form of jihad, putting people under submission to Islam without lifting the sword.
Islamic prayer in public schools is a form of jihad. Dawah booths in our public squares is a form of jihad. The call to prayer in public squares is a form of jihad. Mandatory halal foods in public buildings is a form of jihad.
Islamism is taught in Canadian mosques. It is taught in online courses in Canada. It is proselytized out of dawah booths in our public squares. Our politicians fawn over Islamists. Canadian Imams are not afraid to preach Islamism. And the concerning thing is the congregants do not rebut these teachings either. Following are Islamist quotes from Canadian Imams, literature and mosques. (signs)
This is the type of thing we fight against. This is contrary to our Judeo/Christian ethic. Islamism is a real and present danger. We will continue to warn, despite strong opposition.
Stay strong, stay united, stay peaceful. God keep our land glorious and free.